Image: Atomwise CEO and co-founder Abraham Heifets

COMMENT from

Chinese review designations lag behind US and EU

GlobalData explores why Chinese review designations currently lag behind the US and the EU in terms of the number of designations awarded.

Dr Judith M. Sills. Credit: Arriello

Dr Eric Caugant. Credit: Arriello

The introduction of review designations by China’s National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) in 2015 has shown some success, with more than 190 drugs awarded a priority review, breakthrough therapy or accelerated approval review designation. This has allowed China to overtake Japan, but the country still lags behind the US and EU markets in terms of the number of drug designations awarded.

China reformed its regulatory system in 2015 to include various fast-track programmes to drive the development of drugs for unmet medical needs and serious conditions, launching priority review, breakthrough therapy and accelerated approval designations. The benefits of these designations include earlier approval times and faster review times by the NMPA.

For example, Shanghai Junshi Bioscience’s toripalimab, a monoclonal antibody indicated for metastatic melanoma, was awarded the acceperated approval designation in March 2018. Toripalimab was the first domestic programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody approved in China.

According to GlobalData’s Pharma Intelligence Centre Drugs database, the NMPA awarded review designations to 108% more drug candidates per year than Japan from 2017 to this October. Japan introduced its own review designation scheme in 2017, named Sakigake, as part of the wider Japan Revitalisation Strategy intended to expedite innovative pharmaceuticals’ path to market and to promote the involvement of foreign companies.

China, however, remains behind the European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration in terms of the number of drugs awarded review designations. As shown in figure 1, the US awarded around nine times more designations than China and the EU awarded three times more designations than China over the same six-year time period.

The US and EU review designation programmes were, however, implemented more than 20 years ago; the US awarded its first designation as an orphan drug designation in 1983, with the EU following suit in 2000.

China seeks to continue to drive domestic development with regulatory changes and novel approval pathways to drive growth in innovator therapeutics and unmet needs. While Chinese review designations currently lag behind the US and the EU designation award numbers, it is likely that going forward, it will aim to increase the number of drugs awarded designations to match these industry leaders.

Go to top

02/24/2024 03:29:02
  • Home | Improving safety for multiple drug regimes 
  • In this issue
  • Contents
  • Curtis Health Caps
  • Astrix
  • Briefing
  • Industry news
  • The pharma industry briefing
  • Covid-19 executive briefing by GlobalData
  • Owen Mumford Company Insight
  • Owen Mumford
  • Comment
  • Use of AI in the fight against Covid-19 shows mixed results
  • What does Ireland’s tax hike mean for pharma?
  • Chinese review designations lag behind US and EU
  • The business benefits of text mining in life sciences
  • Mettler Toledo
  • HOF Sonderanlagenbau
  • In Depth
  • Narrow FDA panel vote on Merck’s molnupiravir bolsters outlook on mAbs
  • The challenges of multiple drugs safety reporting
  • 3D printing in drug manufacturing: unlocking future possibilities
  • Can drug repurposing uncover better treatments for UTIs?
  • Pfizer and Takeda deals put a spotlight on value-based pricing
  • Lethal injection: can pharma kill the death penalty?
  • Mimotopes Company Insight
  • Mimotopes
  • In Data
  • Middle-income countries’ healthcare sectors to keep rising through to 2024
  • Data analytics hiring levels in clinical trial operations rose in October
  • Industrial automation innovation in pharma rebounded in the last quarter
  • Global markets and indices
  • Macro-economic indicators
  • Macro-economic indicators (page 2)
  • Yearbook
  • SHL Medical
  • Dr. Paul Lohmann Company Insight
  • Dr. Paul Lohmann
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Nipro
  • Events
  • Next issue
12/15/2021 00:00:00